Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 3, 2020

Witchko v. Schorsch

Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Docket
1:15-cv-06043
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Witchko v. Schorsch, Judge Hellerstein ordered derivative counsel to submit detailed billing and disbursement records before seeking attorneys’ fees.

Who this affects

Derivative plaintiffs’ counsel, including each counsel seeking recovery of attorneys’ fees, had to provide the required billing and disbursement records.

What happened

In Witchko v. Schorsch, Joanne Witchko sued derivatively on behalf of American Realty Capital Properties, Inc.; the opinion addresses derivative plaintiffs’ counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees.

The court ordered each counsel seeking payment to provide contemporaneous, detailed records identifying the date, hours, and work performed, along with records of disbursements. The records and materials referenced in an earlier order were due by January 10, 2020. Without those records, the court said the fee request would not be recognized.

Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein issued the order on January 3, 2020. The opinion does not state the amount of fees requested or make a final fee award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Witchko v. Schorsch · No. 1:15-cv-06043
Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Date
Jan. 3, 2020

Background

Joanne Witchko brought the action derivatively on behalf of nominal defendant American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. The order concerns derivative plaintiffs’ counsel’s claim for attorneys’ fees.

Court’s Order

The court stated that it would not recognize the fee claim unless counsel provided contemporaneous and detailed billing records. The records had to show the services performed in each particular aspect of the case and any disbursements. The court required records from each counsel seeking fee recovery, including the date, hours expended, and nature of the work performed.

The records, together with materials referenced in the court’s prior order dated January 3, 2020, had to be filed by January 10, 2020. The order cites Second Circuit authority requiring contemporaneous time records for applications seeking court-ordered compensation.

Disposition and Scope

The court entered an order requiring submission of the specified records. The opinion does not state the amount of fees requested, determine the amount of any fee award, or describe any final ruling on entitlement to fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.