Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 18, 2021

Mail America Communications, Inc. v. World Healing Center Church, Inc.

Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Docket
1:18-cv-08481
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Mail America Communications v. World Healing Center, Judge Hellerstein allowed judgment registration but denied attorney’s fees and costs as premature.

Who this affects

Mail America Communications, Inc. may register its judgment against World Healing Center Church, Inc. in the Northern District of Texas, the Southern District of California, and other districts where World Healing Center may have assets. Mail America’s request for attorney’s fees and costs was denied without prejudice to renewal after the appeal.

What happened

In Mail America Communications, Inc. v. World Healing Center Church, Inc., the court addressed two requests by Mail America after a $2,993,221.74 judgment was entered against World Healing Center. World Healing Center had appealed and had not requested a pause in enforcement or posted a bond.

The court allowed Mail America to register the judgment in the Northern District of Texas, the Southern District of California, and other districts where World Healing Center might later be found to have assets. The court found good cause because the parties agreed World Healing Center had no assets in the Southern District of New York, while Mail America provided evidence of assets in Texas and California.

Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein denied Mail America’s request for attorney’s fees and costs as premature, without prejudice to renewal within 14 days after the appellate mandate is entered on the docket. The court directed the Clerk to terminate the two motions.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mail America Communications, Inc. v. World Healing Center Church, Inc. · No. 1:18-cv-08481
Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Date
June 18, 2021

Background

On April 7, 2021, the court entered a final judgment against World Healing Center for $2,993,221.74, plus interest and costs. World Healing Center filed a notice of appeal on April 26, 2021. It had not sought a stay of enforcement pending the appeal and had not posted a supersedeas bond, which is a bond used to pause enforcement of a judgment during an appeal.

Mail America filed two motions: one to register the judgment in other federal districts under 28 U.S.C. § 1963, and another seeking attorney’s fees and costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d).

Registration of the Judgment

The court held that a federal judgment may be registered in another district while an appeal is pending when the court finds good cause. The court explained that good cause may be shown when the judgment debtor has substantial property in another district and insufficient property in the district where the judgment was entered. Exact proof of the debtor’s assets is not required.

The parties did not dispute that World Healing Center had no assets in the Southern District of New York sufficient to satisfy the judgment. Mail America submitted an asset search and evidence that World Healing Center maintained administrative operations in Grapevine, Texas, and its central headquarters in Aliso Viejo, California. World Healing Center submitted no contrary evidence and offered no substantial reason to deny registration.

The court therefore granted Mail America’s motion to register the judgment in the Northern District of Texas, the Southern District of California, and other districts where World Healing Center might later be found to have assets.

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

The court stated that the pending appeal could affect which party ultimately qualifies as the prevailing party for purposes of attorney’s fees and costs. Because the appeal could change the outcome relevant to that determination, the court denied Mail America’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs as premature, without prejudice to renewal within 14 days after the appellate mandate is entered on the docket.

Disposition

The motion to register the judgment was granted. The motion for attorney’s fees and costs was denied without prejudice to renewal within 14 days of entry of the appellate mandate. The Clerk was directed to terminate the open motions identified as ECF Nos. 58 and 63.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.