Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 29, 2020

Hernandez v. MNY 7th Corp.

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:19-cv-04481
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hernandez v. MNY 7th Corp., Judge Netburn approved the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

The parties to the action, including Daniel Hernandez, MNY 7th Corp., and the other defendants, are bound by the approved settlement and the dismissal.

What happened

Hernandez v. MNY 7th Corp. is a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law. The parties agreed in principle to settle the case and submitted their proposed settlement for court review.

The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the required standard and found that it was fair and reasonable.

Judge Sarah Netburn approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice. The court kept jurisdiction only to enforce the settlement’s terms.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hernandez v. MNY 7th Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-04481
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Jan. 29, 2020

Background

Daniel Hernandez brought this Fair Labor Standards Act case against MNY 7th Corp. and other defendants. The parties agreed to settlement terms in principle and submitted a proposed settlement for the court’s review.

Court’s analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the procedure required by the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House. The court determined that the settlement was fair and reasonable.

Disposition

The court APPROVED the settlement and DISMISSED the action with prejudice. The court retained jurisdiction over proceedings solely to enforce the settlement’s terms between the parties in this action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.