Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 30, 2020

Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Schenker, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:19-cv-04201
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Schenker, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice, without costs, and closed it.

Who this affects

Hartford Fire Insurance Co. and Schenker, Inc.; the caption also names XYZ Corp. as a defendant.

What happened

Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Schenker, Inc. was resolved after the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

Judge Caproni canceled the scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice, ordered that neither side pay costs or attorneys’ fees, terminated open motions, and closed the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni allowed the parties to ask to reopen the case within 30 days if they showed good cause. They could also ask the court to keep authority to enforce their settlement by filing the agreement and a separate request within that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Schenker, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-04201
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Jan. 30, 2020

Background

The parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the agreement’s terms.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and ordered that neither party would receive costs, including attorneys’ fees. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The parties could apply to reopen the case within 30 days, but the application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of their settlement. The order stated that a request filed after 30 days, or filed without a showing of good cause, could be denied on that basis alone.

If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—meaning continuing authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, terminated the open motions, and closed the case. The order did not decide the underlying dispute on its merits; it resolved the case based on the parties’ agreement in principle.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.