Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 6, 2020

Gregory Destine a/k/a/ Mrs. GoGo Destine v. The City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-00082
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Destine v. City of New York, Judge Swain ordered service of the complaint and denied appeal fee assistance.

Who this affects

Gregory Destine, the City of New York, and Police Officer Joseph; the order primarily concerns service of the complaint and Destine's ability to appeal without prepaying fees.

What happened

Gregory Destine, who was incarcerated and representing himself, sued the City of New York and Police Officer Joseph. The court understood his complaint to raise federal constitutional claims under Section 1983 and state-law claims.

Because Destine had permission to proceed without paying court fees upfront, the court directed the court clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to issue summonses and serve both defendants. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued and required Destine to report any address change.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the clerk to carry out those service instructions and denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide whether Destine's claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gregory Destine a/k/a/ Mrs. GoGo Destine v. The City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-00082
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 6, 2020

Background

Gregory Destine, who was incarcerated and appeared without a lawyer, sued the City of New York and Police Officer Joseph. The court construed the complaint as asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a statute allowing claims for certain constitutional-rights violations by state or local officials, as well as state-law claims. The court had previously granted Destine permission to proceed without paying the filing fee upfront. The opinion also states that prisoners must still pay the full filing fee over time under the applicable statute.

Service of the complaint

The court explained that a person allowed to proceed without prepaying fees may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint. Because Destine could not have served the defendants before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses, the court extended the service deadline to 90 days after summonses are issued. The court said that, if service is not completed within that period, Destine should request an extension of time.

The clerk was instructed to issue summonses for the City of New York and Officer Joseph, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, and provide the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. Destine was also required to notify the court of any address change; the order states that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to mail Destine a copy of the order and an information package and to arrange service through the Marshals Service. The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. This order addressed service and appeal-fee status; it did not decide the merits of Destine's constitutional or state-law claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.