Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 6, 2020

Cheng v. The Department of Justice

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-00509
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Cheng v. Department of Justice, Judge McMahon transferred Zhilong Cheng’s immigration-detention petition to Pennsylvania because the petition concerned confinement there.

Who this affects

Zhilong Cheng’s petition was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The order did not decide whether Cheng should be released.

What happened

Cheng v. The Department of Justice concerns Zhilong Cheng’s self-represented petition seeking release from immigration detention under a federal law allowing challenges to custody. Cheng was detained at Pike County Correctional Facility in Pennsylvania.

Judge McMahon explained that such a custody challenge generally belongs in the federal district where the person is confined, because that court can oversee the person’s custodian. The opinion also noted documents suggesting that a Pennsylvania lawyer representing Cheng was seeking his release, while Cheng identified no facts showing that the Southern District of New York was the proper venue.

Judge Colleen McMahon transferred the petition to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and closed the New York case. The transferee court will decide whether Cheng may proceed without paying fees; this order did not decide whether he should be released.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cheng v. The Department of Justice · No. 1:20-cv-00509
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Feb. 6, 2020

Background

Zhilong Cheng, who was representing himself, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a federal law that allows a person to challenge certain forms of custody. Cheng sought release from immigration detention. The opinion states that he was detained at Pike County Correctional Facility in Lords Valley, Pennsylvania.

Reason for Transfer

The court explained that a court hearing a custody challenge must have authority over the person or entity holding the petitioner. For a challenge to physical confinement, the proper federal district generally is the district where the petitioner is confined. The court identified the Middle District of Pennsylvania as a proper venue because Pike County Correctional Facility is located there. The court also noted documents suggesting that a Pennsylvania lawyer representing Cheng was seeking his release. Cheng did not state facts showing that the Southern District of New York was a proper venue. The opinion says Cheng mailed the petition to that court because he believed Judge Jed S. Rakoff would be sympathetic, but the court explained that venue is not determined by that consideration.

Disposition

The court transferred the petition to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a statute allowing transfer when venue is improper or should be changed in the interest of justice. The Clerk was directed to mail Cheng a copy of the order, record service, and transfer the action. The transferee court was left to decide whether Cheng could proceed without paying fees. The order closed the Southern District of New York case. Judge Colleen McMahon also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.