Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 12, 2020

Jordan v. Pierre

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:18-cv-08528
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jordan v. Pierre, Judge Koeltl ordered another attempt to serve Michael Davidson and extended the service deadline to April 13, 2020.

Who this affects

The order primarily affects Victor Jordan’s effort to serve Michael Davidson. It also directs actions by the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

Jordan v. Pierre concerns Victor Jordan’s efforts to serve defendant Michael Davidson in this federal lawsuit.

The court found that the Marshals had rejected a service package and had already tried four times to serve Davidson at the home address Jordan provided. The court ordered the Clerk to prepare the necessary form and paperwork and directed the Marshals to attempt service at that address.

Judge John G. Koeltl extended the deadline for service until April 13, 2020, and directed service by “nail and mail” under New York law.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jordan v. Pierre · No. 1:18-cv-08528
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
Feb. 12, 2020

Background

The order addressed service of process on defendant Michael Davidson. The court had previously authorized Victor Jordan to use New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 308(4), which permits “nail and mail” service in specified circumstances. Jordan told the court that he had given the U.S. Marshals Service a current address for Davidson that differed from Davidson’s business address at the Board of Elections.

The docket showed that the Marshals had rejected the service package because the home address was not a “proper business address” under the court’s earlier order. The Marshals had also already made four attempts to serve Davidson at the home address Jordan provided.

Court’s action

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form using the previously provided home address. The Clerk was also directed to issue a new summons and give the Marshals all paperwork needed to attempt service.

The court relied on authorities stating that a plaintiff authorized to proceed without paying filing fees may rely on the court and the Marshals to effect service. It extended the Marshals’ time to serve Davidson until April 13, 2020. The court stated that, if service was not completed by then, Jordan should request an extension of time.

Disposition

Judge John G. Koeltl directed the Clerk to complete the service form and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals. He directed the Marshals to serve Davidson by “nail and mail” under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 308(4), and directed that a copy of the order be mailed to Jordan and noted on the docket. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.