Pinero v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
Daisy Y. Pinero v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Inc. and Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc. as successor in interest to Burlington Coat Factory of New York, LLC
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:19-cv-11524
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Pinero v. Burlington Coat Factory, Judge Karas ordered U.S. Marshals service of the pro se plaintiff’s lawsuit.
The order affects Daisy Y. Pinero and the two Burlington Coat Factory defendants by arranging service through the U.S. Marshals Service and setting the service deadline.
What happened
Daisy Y. Pinero sued Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Inc. and Burlington Coat Factory of NY, LLC, asserting state-law negligence and negligent emotional-distress claims.
The court had allowed Pinero to proceed without paying filing fees, so she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court extended the service deadline until 90 days after summonses were issued.
Judge Kenneth M. Karas directed the Clerk to issue summonses, prepare service forms, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.
The detailed version
- Pinero v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation · No. 7:19-cv-11524
- Kenneth Karas
- Feb. 20, 2020
Background
Daisy Y. Pinero, appearing without a lawyer, brought state-law claims for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress under the court’s diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction. The opinion states that the court had previously granted her permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.
Service of Process
Because Pinero was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court stated that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally require service within 90 days after filing the complaint, the court explained that Pinero could not serve the summonses and complaint until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses issued. The court therefore extended the service deadline until 90 days after the summonses were issued.
The Clerk of Court was directed to prepare a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Inc. and Burlington Coat Factory of New York, LLC; issue summonses; and deliver the documents needed for the Marshals Service to complete service. The opinion lists service addresses for both defendants.
Other Directions and Disposition
The court required Pinero to notify the court in writing if her address changed and stated that the action could be dismissed if she failed to do so. Kenneth M. Karas directed the Clerk to mail Pinero a copy of the order and an information package. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. This was an order arranging service and related procedures; it did not decide the negligence or emotional-distress claims.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.