So v. Sidi
- Andrew Carter
- 1:18-cv-11526
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In So v. Sidi, Judge Carter approved the parties’ settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice, retaining enforcement authority for 60 days.
Jack So and defendants Ziv Sidi, Natalia Virych, and Zound Pro LLC; the settlement was approved and the case was dismissed with prejudice.
What happened
In So v. Sidi, Jack So and the defendants submitted a settlement and release agreement for court review.
The court found the agreement fair and reasonable and approved it. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. dismissed and discontinued the case with prejudice, while retaining authority to enforce the agreement for no longer than 60 days after dismissal.
The detailed version
- So v. Sidi · No. 1:18-cv-11526
- Andrew Carter
- Feb. 21, 2020
Background
The court reviewed the parties’ settlement and release agreement as required by the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the agreement’s terms.
Ruling
The court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it. It then dismissed and discontinued the matter with prejudice. The court reserved authority to enforce the agreement’s terms for a period no longer than 60 days after dismissal.
Disposition
Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. approved the settlement and dismissed and discontinued the case with prejudice. The court retained limited enforcement authority for up to 60 days following dismissal.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.