Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 21, 2020

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Installrite Woodworkers Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:20-cv-01447
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees v. Installrite Woodworkers, Judge Torres set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award without deciding it.

Who this affects

The petitioners received deadlines to submit materials and serve Installrite Woodworkers Inc.; Installrite received a deadline to oppose the petition.

What happened

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, along with the other petitioners, filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against Installrite Woodworkers Inc.

The court ordered the petitioners to file supporting materials and a legal brief by March 20, 2020. Installrite’s opposition was due April 10, and any reply was due April 24. The petitioners also had to personally serve the petition and order on Installrite and serve the secretary of state, then file proof of service.

Judge Analisa Torres issued these scheduling and service orders on February 21, 2020. The order did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:20-cv-01447
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Feb. 21, 2020

Background

On February 19, 2020, the petitioners filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment, meaning the court considers the parties’ supporting materials under procedures used for deciding whether a case can be resolved without a trial.

Orders and Deadlines

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1 and any additional supporting materials by March 20, 2020. Those materials were to include memoranda of law, the arbitration award, supporting documents, and affidavits or declarations stating that the exhibits were true and correct copies of the documents they purported to be.

Installrite’s opposition was due April 10, 2020. The petitioners’ reply, if any, was due April 24, 2020.

The court separately ordered the petitioners to serve Installrite with the petition and the order by March 6, 2020, using the service methods identified in New York law. They also had to serve the secretary of state and file an affidavit proving service by March 11, 2020.

Disposition

Judge Analisa Torres entered a scheduling and service order. The opinion does not state that the court granted or denied the petition, and it does not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.