Malkin v. Shasha
- Analisa Torres
- 1:20-cv-09874
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Malkin v. Shasha, Judge Torres denied a proposed briefing schedule and ordered the arbitration challenge proceed through summary-judgment briefing.
The petitioners and respondents in the arbitration-award proceeding were affected. The petitioners received deadlines to file a summary-judgment motion and serve the petition and order; the respondents received deadlines to oppose the motion.
What happened
In Malkin v. Shasha, the petitioners asked the court to partly cancel and otherwise confirm an arbitration award. They filed the motions on November 23, 2020.
The parties jointly proposed a briefing schedule, but the court denied that request. The court explained that a request to cancel an arbitration award must be handled like a motion for summary judgment, with supporting materials and required factual statements.
Judge Analisa Torres ordered the petitioners to file their summary-judgment motion and supporting materials by January 11, 2021, allowed the respondents until February 1 to oppose it, and allowed a reply by February 8. The order did not decide whether the arbitration award should be canceled or confirmed.
The detailed version
- Malkin v. Shasha · No. 1:20-cv-09874
- Analisa Torres
- Dec. 15, 2020
Background
On November 23, 2020, the petitioners filed a motion to partly cancel and otherwise confirm an arbitration award. They also filed a motion to cancel and otherwise confirm an arbitration award. On December 7, 2020, the parties submitted a joint letter proposing a briefing schedule.
Court’s analysis
The court denied the proposed briefing schedule. It stated that a petition to cancel an arbitration award must be treated like a motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is a procedure for deciding whether the evidence shows that a case can be resolved without a trial. The court therefore required the petitioners to present their request under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 56.1 of the Southern District of New York.
Order
The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve their summary-judgment motion, their required Rule 56.1 statement, the arbitration award, supporting documents, and affidavits or declarations authenticating the materials by January 11, 2021. The respondents were ordered to file their opposition and response to the Rule 56.1 statement by February 1, 2021. The petitioners could file a reply by February 8, 2021.
The court also ordered the petitioners to personally serve the petition and the order on the respondents by December 23, 2020, using the methods identified under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 311, and to file proof of service by December 30, 2020. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 2 and 13. Judge Analisa Torres did not decide the underlying request to cancel or confirm the arbitration award.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Mar 2021
- Whittakerv. MHR Fund
- Media Forcev. Precise Leads
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Jul 2020
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Mar 2020
- Trustees for the Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund…Dec 2019