Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 15, 2020

Malkin v. Shasha

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:20-cv-09874
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ArbitrationCivil ProcedureSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In Malkin v. Shasha, Judge Torres denied a proposed briefing schedule and ordered the arbitration challenge proceed through summary-judgment briefing.

Who this affects

The petitioners and respondents in the arbitration-award proceeding were affected. The petitioners received deadlines to file a summary-judgment motion and serve the petition and order; the respondents received deadlines to oppose the motion.

What happened

In Malkin v. Shasha, the petitioners asked the court to partly cancel and otherwise confirm an arbitration award. They filed the motions on November 23, 2020.

The parties jointly proposed a briefing schedule, but the court denied that request. The court explained that a request to cancel an arbitration award must be handled like a motion for summary judgment, with supporting materials and required factual statements.

Judge Analisa Torres ordered the petitioners to file their summary-judgment motion and supporting materials by January 11, 2021, allowed the respondents until February 1 to oppose it, and allowed a reply by February 8. The order did not decide whether the arbitration award should be canceled or confirmed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Malkin v. Shasha · No. 1:20-cv-09874
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Dec. 15, 2020

Background

On November 23, 2020, the petitioners filed a motion to partly cancel and otherwise confirm an arbitration award. They also filed a motion to cancel and otherwise confirm an arbitration award. On December 7, 2020, the parties submitted a joint letter proposing a briefing schedule.

Court’s analysis

The court denied the proposed briefing schedule. It stated that a petition to cancel an arbitration award must be treated like a motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is a procedure for deciding whether the evidence shows that a case can be resolved without a trial. The court therefore required the petitioners to present their request under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 56.1 of the Southern District of New York.

Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve their summary-judgment motion, their required Rule 56.1 statement, the arbitration award, supporting documents, and affidavits or declarations authenticating the materials by January 11, 2021. The respondents were ordered to file their opposition and response to the Rule 56.1 statement by February 1, 2021. The petitioners could file a reply by February 8, 2021.

The court also ordered the petitioners to personally serve the petition and the order on the respondents by December 23, 2020, using the methods identified under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 311, and to file proof of service by December 30, 2020. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 2 and 13. Judge Analisa Torres did not decide the underlying request to cancel or confirm the arbitration award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.