Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 24, 2020

Basurto v. Lighthouse Fishmarket Inc.

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:18-cv-04889
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Basurto v. Lighthouse Fishmarket, Judge Lehrburger approved the parties’ fair and reasonable wage settlement and ordered the case closed.

Who this affects

The order affected Gonzalo Cornelio Basurto, the proposed similarly situated plaintiffs, Lighthouse Fishmarket Inc., Michael Clopton, and the status of the case, which the court ordered closed.

What happened

Gonzalo Cornelio Basurto brought this case for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law against Lighthouse Fishmarket Inc. and Michael Clopton. He brought it individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.

The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement. The court reviewed the agreement and considered the risks, costs, possible recovery, attorney’s fees, and whether the agreement resulted from fair negotiations rather than fraud, collusion, or employer overreaching.

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it. The court directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Basurto v. Lighthouse Fishmarket Inc. · No. 1:18-cv-04889
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
Feb. 24, 2020

Background

Gonzalo Cornelio Basurto sued Lighthouse Fishmarket Inc., doing business as Lighthouse Fish Market & Restaurant, and Michael Clopton. The action sought damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law, and the New York Labor Law. Basurto sued individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction for all purposes.

Settlement Review

The parties submitted a joint letter asking the court to approve their settlement agreement. The court explained that federal courts must review Fair Labor Standards Act settlements to determine whether they are fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than employer overreaching. The court had assisted in mediating the case and reviewed the settlement agreement and the parties’ letter.

In evaluating the agreement, the court considered prior proceedings, the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the case, the possible range of recovery, whether the agreement resulted from arm’s-length bargaining between experienced counsel or parties, attorney’s fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion. The court noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality restrictions, that its non-disparagement provision was mutual and limited, that its releases were limited to wage-and-hour and other labor-related claims, and that the attorney’s fees were within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range.

Ruling

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger found the settlement agreement fair and reasonable and approved it. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or describe any separate distribution process.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.