Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 2, 2020

Williams v. African American Planning Commission, Inc

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:19-cv-11046
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Williams v. African American Planning Commission, Judge Vyskocil ordered clarification about a proposed voluntary dismissal and possible settlement.

Who this affects

Gail Williams and the African American Planning Commission, Inc.; the order required Williams to clarify the basis for the proposed dismissal and required the parties to submit a settlement agreement for court approval if applicable.

What happened

In Williams v. African American Planning Commission, Inc., Gail Williams filed a notice stating that she voluntarily dismissed the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.

The court received the notice but ordered Williams to file a letter by March 12, 2020, explaining whether the proposed dismissal was based on a settlement.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil further ordered that, if the dismissal resulted from a settlement, the parties file the proposed agreement by April 13, 2020, with supporting materials needed for the court to decide whether the agreement was fair and reasonable.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. African American Planning Commission, Inc · No. 1:19-cv-11046
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Mar. 2, 2020

Background

Gail Williams filed a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). The court stated that it had received the notice, which was filed on February 27, 2020.

Court’s Order

The court ordered Williams to file a letter by March 12, 2020, stating whether the proposed dismissal was based on a settlement. If it was based on a settlement, the court ordered the parties to file the proposed settlement agreement by April 13, 2020.

The court also required the request for approval to include a declaration and any other evidence needed to support a finding that the agreement was fair and reasonable. The opinion cited Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The order does not state that the court approved a settlement or entered the dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.