Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 2, 2020

Maricultura Del Norte, S. De R.L. De C.V. v. Worldbusiness Capital, Inc.

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:14-cv-10143
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureTax
In one sentence

In Maricultura v. Worldbusiness, Chief Judge McMahon ruled Servax’s recovery excludes the Customs Fee but includes associated interest after the tax was vacated.

Who this affects

Servax Bleu may collect the amended judgment after subtracting the Worldbusiness settlement and the Customs Fee, while Umami Sustainable Seafood’s requested reduction for the Customs Fee was resolved in that manner. Maricultura is affected because the ruling concerns its unpaid Mexican tax assessment and related interest.

What happened

Maricultura Del Norte and Servax sought the remaining amount of an amended judgment against Umami and other defendants. Umami asked the court to reduce the judgment by several amounts, including a $750,000 Mexican Customs Fee and related interest.

The court previously required evidence showing whether Mexican authorities had reimposed the Customs Fee or permanently vacated it. Servax later stated that it had no evidence or information that the Mexican tax authorities had restarted the assessment.

Chief Judge McMahon ruled that Servax may recover the amended judgment minus the Worldbusiness settlement and the Customs Fee, plus associated interest. Servax may not recover interest on the Customs Fee that accrued before the fee was vacated.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Maricultura Del Norte, S. De R.L. De C.V. v. Worldbusiness Capital, Inc. · No. 1:14-cv-10143
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 2, 2020

Background

The order addressed the Customs Fee portion of an amended judgment. Servax Bleu, S. de R.L. de C.V. sought a turnover order and writ of execution for the unpaid balance. Umami Sustainable Seafood, Inc., the judgment debtor, had asked the court to reduce the judgment by several amounts, including a $750,000 tax assessment owed by Maricultura Del Norte, S. de R.L. de C.V. to the Mexican Tax Authority and $174,759.99 in related prejudgment interest.

A Mexican Administrative Court nullified the Customs Fee on June 28, 2019. But the court previously found that Umami had not provided sufficiently convincing evidence that the tax could no longer be imposed, while Servax’s evidence also did not establish whether a reassessment might occur. The court therefore held Umami’s request concerning the Customs Fee in abeyance and gave the parties ten business days to provide evidence showing either that the tax had been reimposed or that it had been permanently vacated and could not be reimposed under Mexican law.

Ruling

Servax stipulated that it had no evidence or information indicating that Mexican tax authorities had restarted the assessment of customs penalties against Maricultura. The court consequently ruled that Servax was entitled to the amended judgment minus the settlement between Servax and Worldbusiness and minus the Customs Fee, plus associated interest. Because Maricultura had never paid any part of the Customs Fee, Servax was not entitled to interest on that fee that accrued before its vacatur. The order was issued by McMahon, C.J.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.