Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 3, 2020

Raghubir v. United States of America

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-01586
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Raghubir v. United States, Judge McMahon transferred Raghubir’s custody-review petition to Northern Florida because the custodian was there.

Who this affects

Vinodh Raghubir’s § 2241 petition was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Northern District of Florida. The receiving court would decide whether he could proceed without paying filing fees and would address the petition further.

What happened

Raghubir v. United States involved Vinodh Raghubir’s petition asking a federal court to review his custody. He filed it without a lawyer under a federal law for challenging custody, while incarcerated at Taylor Correctional Institution in Florida.

The court explained that a custody petition generally must be heard where the person responsible for the petitioner’s confinement is located. Taylor Correctional Institution is in the Northern District of Florida, so the Southern District of New York transferred the petition there in the interest of justice.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the transfer, closed the case in New York, and left the decision about proceeding without paying fees to the receiving court. The court also said no certificate allowing an appeal would issue and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Raghubir v. United States of America · No. 1:20-cv-01586
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 3, 2020

Background

Vinodh Raghubir filed a petition without a lawyer under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a law allowing a person to challenge certain forms of federal custody. The Southern District of New York received the petition on February 20, 2020. Raghubir was incarcerated at Taylor Correctional Institution, a state prison in Perry, Florida. The opinion also states that he had not paid the $5 filing fee or submitted an application to proceed without paying the fee.

Reason for transfer

The court explained that a court hearing a petition under § 2241 must have jurisdiction over the petitioner’s custodian—the person or authority responsible for the petitioner’s confinement. A challenge to physical confinement generally belongs in the federal district where the petitioner is confined. Taylor Correctional Institution is in Taylor County, within the Northern District of Florida. The court therefore concluded that the Northern District of Florida was the proper court and transferred the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), which permits transfer when a case is filed in the wrong federal district if transfer serves the interest of justice.

Ruling and other orders

The court ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida and closed the case in the Southern District of New York. It stated that the receiving court would decide whether Raghubir could proceed without paying fees. The court also ruled that no certificate of appealability would issue because the petition made no substantial showing that a constitutional right had been denied. In addition, it certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. Judge Colleen McMahon signed the order as Chief United States District Judge.

Disposition

The petition was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The opinion does not decide the underlying custody challenge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.