Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 9, 2020

Reyes v. Tava Cafe LLC

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:18-cv-10210
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Reyes v. Tava Cafe LLC, Judge Netburn approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the Fair Labor Standards Act action were affected: the settlement was approved, and the action was dismissed with prejudice.

What happened

Reyes v. Tava Cafe LLC is a Fair Labor Standards Act case in which the parties agreed to settlement terms in principle. They submitted a proposed settlement for the court’s review on March 2, 2020.

The court found that the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable. It approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, meaning the action was ended and could not be brought again.

Judge Sarah Netburn issued the order on March 9, 2020. The opinion does not provide the settlement amount or other settlement terms.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Reyes v. Tava Cafe LLC · No. 1:18-cv-10210
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Mar. 9, 2020

Background

This Fair Labor Standards Act case was brought by Yoel Julian Reyes and other plaintiffs against Tava Cafe LLC and other defendants. The parties agreed to the terms of a settlement in principle and submitted a proposed settlement to the court on March 2, 2020.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the procedure required for court review of Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. It determined that the settlement was fair and reasonable.

Disposition

The court approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or provide the other terms of the agreement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.