Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 28, 2020

New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. U.S. Tech…

Full caption

New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. U.S. Tech Construction Corp.

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:20-cv-03282
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. U.S. Tech Construction Corp., Judge Furman set deadlines for an arbitration-confirmation petition.

Who this affects

The order affects the New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters, which must file and serve materials and a service affidavit, and U.S. Tech Construction Corp., which may oppose the petition.

What happened

New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters filed a petition on April 27, 2020, asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against U.S. Tech Construction Corp.

The court ordered the petitioner to file and serve any additional supporting materials by May 4, 2020. U.S. Tech’s opposition, if any, was due May 18, and the petitioner’s reply, if any, was due May 25.

Judge Furman also required electronic and overnight-mail service of the petition, supporting papers, and order, plus a service affidavit. The order set the schedule but did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. U.S. Tech… · No. 1:20-cv-03282
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Apr. 28, 2020

Background

On April 27, 2020, the New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the petitioner to file any additional materials supporting its petition by May 4, 2020, and to serve those materials on U.S. Tech Construction Corp. by electronic delivery and overnight mail by the same date. U.S. Tech’s opposition, if any, was due May 18, 2020. The petitioner’s reply, if any, was due May 25, 2020. The petitioner also had to file an affidavit confirming service by May 5, 2020.

Disposition

Judge Jesse M. Furman issued a scheduling and service order. The order did not grant or deny the petition and did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.