Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 28, 2020

Hamm v. NYPD Parking Enforcement Action Unit

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-02687
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureFee PetitionPro Se
In one sentence

In Hamm v. NYPD Parking Enforcement Action Unit, Judge McMahon ordered Jeffery Hamm to pay fees or submit amended fee-waiver papers and update his address.

Who this affects

Jeffery Hamm must either pay the required fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees, and must update his address within 30 days. The case could be dismissed without prejudice if he does not comply.

What happened

In Hamm v. NYPD Parking Enforcement Action Unit, Jeffery Hamm was held at the North Infirmary Command on Rikers Island when he filed the case and was therefore subject to rules governing incarcerated plaintiffs. The court later learned from public records that he had been released.

The court ordered Hamm to either pay $400 in filing and administrative fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days. He also had to update his address within that time. The court warned that it would dismiss the action without prejudice to refiling if he did not comply, and no summons would issue then.

Judge Colleen McMahon also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from the order, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hamm v. NYPD Parking Enforcement Action Unit · No. 1:20-cv-02687
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Apr. 28, 2020

Background

Jeffery Hamm proceeded without a lawyer and was held at the North Infirmary Command on Rikers Island when he filed this action. Because he was incarcerated at the time of filing, the court determined that he was a prisoner under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a federal law that imposes certain requirements on incarcerated plaintiffs. Those requirements include paying the $350 filing fee in installments when proceeding without prepaying the fee and, in some circumstances, being barred from that status after three qualifying prior cases. Prisoners must also exhaust available prison administrative remedies.

Before deciding Hamm’s request to proceed without prepaying fees, the court learned from public records that he had been released. The court stated that, after release, his obligation to pay fees would be determined under the standards applicable to non-prisoners. Because his financial situation might have changed, the court required a new financial application.

Order

The court ordered Hamm, within 30 days, to do one of two things: pay $400 in fees, consisting of the $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee, or complete and submit the attached amended application to proceed without prepaying fees. The amended application had to include docket number 1:20-CV-2687 (CM). Hamm also had to update his address of record within 30 days.

The court warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action without prejudice to refiling. No summons would issue at that time. The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal.

Disposition and Classification

This was a procedural order about filing fees, financial eligibility, address information, and possible future dismissal. The court did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants. Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Hamm and note service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.