Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2020

Delaney v. Republic National Committee

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-01625
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Delaney v. Republican National Committee, Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Delaney failed to follow filing-fee and address instructions.

Who this affects

Dennis W. Delaney’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice after he failed to comply with the court’s filing-fee and contact-information requirements; the Republican National Committee was the defendant.

What happened

In Dennis W. Delaney v. Republican National Committee, the court had directed Delaney to submit an amended request to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the required $400 fee. The court also instructed him to provide a mailing address or agree to receive documents electronically.

The March 9, 2020 order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal. Delaney did not respond to that order.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice. She also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Delaney v. Republic National Committee · No. 1:20-cv-01625
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
May 14, 2020

Background

On March 9, 2020, the court ordered Dennis W. Delaney to do one of two things within 30 days: submit an amended request to proceed without paying the filing fee, or pay the $400 fee required to file a civil action. Because Delaney had not provided a mailing address, the court also required him either to provide one or to consent to electronic service, which means receiving court documents electronically. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Ruling

Delaney did not respond to the March 9 order. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal itself does not bar a later filing, although the opinion does not address whether any later filing would satisfy other requirements.

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee. The Clerk of Court was directed to notify Delaney electronically of the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.