Luna v. City of New York
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:20-cv-02692
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Luna v. City of New York, Judge Caproni ordered Marshals service for Luna’s Title VII suit and denied IFP status for an appeal.
Daniel Luna and the four named defendants—City of New York, Health & Hospitals Corporation, Angela Newman, and Olsen Montoya—were affected by the court’s service instructions. Luna was also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.
What happened
In Luna v. City of New York, Daniel Luna, representing himself, alleged that his employer discriminated against him because of his gender under Title VII. The court also treated his allegations as raising related state-law claims.
Because Luna had been allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, the court ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the City of New York, Health & Hospitals Corporation, Angela Newman, and Olsen Montoya. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued.
Judge Valerie Caproni directed the Clerk of Court to prepare the service paperwork and mail Luna information about the case. She also denied Luna permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Luna v. City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-02692
- Valerie Caproni
- Apr. 30, 2020
Background
Daniel Luna, proceeding without a lawyer, brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging that his employer discriminated against him based on gender. The court construed his allegations as also asserting related state-law claims. The court had previously granted Luna permission to proceed without paying the filing fee.
Service of the defendants
Because Luna was proceeding without paying the filing fee, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint. The court extended the usual 90-day service period so that the deadline would be 90 days after the summons is issued.
The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summonses, and deliver the necessary papers to the Marshals Service. The defendants identified for service were the City of New York, Health & Hospitals Corporation, Angela Newman, and Olsen Montoya. The court also instructed Luna to notify the court in writing if his address changes and warned that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.
Ruling
Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the Clerk of Court to mail Luna a copy of the order and an information package and to provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the defendants. The court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for the purpose of an appeal. This order addressed service and appeal-fee status; it did not decide whether Luna’s discrimination claims were legally valid.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.