Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 6, 2020

Nunez v. Liberty Place Property Management

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:19-cv-05743
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Nunez v. Liberty Place Property Management, Judge Netburn ordered the parties to submit their executed settlement agreement for review in this Fair Labor Standards Act case.

Who this affects

The parties to the Fair Labor Standards Act case—Hector Nunez and the other plaintiffs, and Liberty Place Property Management and the other defendants—were required to submit their executed settlement agreement for court review.

What happened

In Hector Nunez, et al. v. Liberty Place Property Management, et al., the parties reached settlement terms in principle during a court conference in this Fair Labor Standards Act case.

The court instructed the parties to submit their signed settlement agreement for review by May 12, 2020. The agreement was to be filed publicly unless a party could show a valid basis for keeping it sealed.

Judge Sarah Netburn issued the order on May 6, 2020. The order does not state whether the settlement was ultimately approved.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nunez v. Liberty Place Property Management · No. 1:19-cv-05743
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
May 6, 2020

Background

This Fair Labor Standards Act case involved Hector Nunez and other plaintiffs against Liberty Place Property Management and other defendants. The parties appeared before the court for a settlement conference on April 2, 2020, and agreed to settlement terms in principle.

Order

The court instructed the parties to submit their executed settlement agreement for the court’s review no later than Tuesday, May 12, 2020. The agreement was to be filed publicly through the court’s electronic filing system unless a party established a basis for sealing it under the standard stated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).

Disposition

Judge Sarah Netburn issued this settlement-related order. The opinion does not state whether the settlement was ultimately approved or whether the case was otherwise resolved.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.