Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 19, 2020

Ottah v. National Grid

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:19-cv-08289
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Ottah v. National Grid, District Judge Engelmayer adopted a recommendation and granted National Grid’s motion to dismiss in its entirety, closing the case.

Who this affects

The ruling affects Chikezie Ottah and National Grid: National Grid’s motion to dismiss was granted in its entirety, and the case was closed.

What happened

In Ottah v. National Grid, Chikezie Ottah sued National Grid, and a magistrate judge recommended granting National Grid’s motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim.

Neither party objected to the recommendation. The district court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found no error in the magistrate judge’s conclusions.

District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer adopted the recommendation in full, granted National Grid’s motion to dismiss in its entirety, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The court also stated that the parties’ failure to object waived appellate review.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ottah v. National Grid · No. 1:19-cv-08289
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
May 19, 2020

Background

The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger for general pretrial management and to resolve National Grid’s motion to dismiss. Judge Lehrburger issued a Report and Recommendation on April 27, 2020, recommending that the court grant the motion in full and dismiss the case for failure to state a claim. The district court incorporated the Report’s summary of the facts by reference rather than repeating those facts in the opinion.

Review of the Recommendation

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), a district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s recommendations. Because neither party filed objections, the court reviewed the Report for clear error—an obvious mistake on the face of the record. The court found no such error and determined that the Report was thorough and well reasoned. The opinion also states that the parties’ failure to file timely objections operated as a waiver of appellate review.

Ruling

District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The court granted National Grid’s motion to dismiss in its entirety and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion at docket 15 and close the case. The opinion does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.