Cole v. New York City Department of Corrections
- Katherine Failla
- 1:20-cv-03981
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Cole v. New York City Department of Correction, Judge McMahon ordered Ronnie Cole to pay filing fees or submit forms to seek fee-free filing.
Ronnie Cole, the incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must satisfy the court's filing-fee or application requirements for the action to proceed.
What happened
In Cole v. New York City Department of Correction, Ronnie Cole, who was incarcerated on Rikers Island and representing himself, filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to request payment without prepaying them.
The court gave Cole 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit a completed application and authorization allowing installment payments from his prisoner account. The order stated that the case would be processed if he complied and would be dismissed if he did not. No summons was issued at that time.
Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk of Court to mail Cole the order and denied payment-free status for any appeal from the order, certifying that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order addressed filing requirements, not the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Cole v. New York City Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-03981
- Katherine Failla
- May 27, 2020
Background
Ronnie Cole filed this civil action while incarcerated on Rikers Island and represented himself. The opinion states that his claims had previously been separated from a purported class action and opened as this new case. Cole submitted his complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or an authorization for a prisoner.
Filing requirements
The court explained that a prisoner bringing a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. If the court grants that application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and provide certified copies of the prisoner's account statements for the preceding six months.
Order
The court ordered Cole, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 in fees or submit the required application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 20-CV-3981 (CM). It directed the Clerk of Court to mail him a copy of the order and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk's procedures if Cole complied and that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed period.
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied payment-free status for purposes of an appeal. The opinion also cautioned that a later dismissal as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner litigation statute. This order did not decide the merits of Cole's underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.