Cadet v. Alliance Nursing Staffing of New York, Inc.
- Katherine Failla
- 1:21-cv-03994
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Cadet v. Alliance Nursing Staffing, Judge Failla ordered service through the Marshals and granted Cadet’s electronic-filing request.
Sherly Cadet and Alliance Nursing Staffing of New York, Inc.; the order also directs the court clerk and the U.S. Marshals Service to carry out service of the summons and complaint.
What happened
In Cadet v. Alliance Nursing Staffing of New York, Inc., Sherly Cadet, who is representing herself, sued her former employer under federal and New York City laws. The court also read her complaint as raising claims under New York State’s Human Rights Law.
Cadet had permission to proceed without paying filing fees. Because of that status, the court said she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Alliance. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after a summons is issued.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla directed the clerk to issue the summons, complete the service paperwork, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. Judge Failla also granted Cadet’s request to use electronic filing and directed the clerk to terminate that motion.
The detailed version
- Cadet v. Alliance Nursing Staffing of New York, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-03994
- Katherine Failla
- June 9, 2021
Background
Sherly Cadet, appearing without a lawyer, sued her former employer, Alliance Nursing Staffing of New York, Inc. She asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the New York City Human Rights Law. The court read the complaint as also asserting claims under the New York State Human Rights Law.
Chief Judge Swain had granted Cadet permission to proceed without paying filing fees. The opinion does not decide whether any of Cadet’s claims have merit.
Service of the Complaint
Because Cadet was proceeding without paying filing fees, the court said she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Alliance. The court explained that Cadet could not have served Alliance before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued.
The court extended the deadline for serving Alliance until 90 days after the date a summons is issued. It stated that, if Alliance is not served within that period, Cadet should request an extension of time.
Orders
Judge Katherine Polk Failla directed the clerk to issue a summons for Alliance, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with Alliance’s service address, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service so it can serve the summons and complaint.
The court also directed Cadet to notify the court in writing if her address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if she fails to do so. The court granted Cadet’s motion for permission to use electronic case filing and directed the clerk to terminate that motion from the docket.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.