Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 1, 2020

Borchers v. One Search Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-03189
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Borchers v. One Search, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs, while allowing limited reopening requests.

Who this affects

Ryan Borchers and One Search Inc.; the court canceled the case’s scheduled proceedings, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, and closed the case, subject to the stated 30-day procedures for reopening or requesting authority to enforce the settlement.

What happened

In Borchers v. One Search Inc., the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs to either party, terminated open motions, and closed the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni allowed the parties 30 days to request reopening for good cause and to ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Borchers v. One Search Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-03189
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
June 1, 2020

Background

On May 29, 2020, Ryan Borchers and One Search Inc. notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or provide the settlement agreement.

Ruling

The court ordered that all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines be canceled. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Possible Reopening and Settlement Enforcement

The parties could apply to reopen the case within 30 days, but the application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement. The order states that a request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis alone. The parties could also ask the court to retain jurisdiction—meaning authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, but they had to submit the agreement and a request for retained jurisdiction within the same 30-day period.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.