Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled June 1, 2020

Walsh v. Townsquare Media, Inc.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-04958
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
20
Intellectual PropertyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Walsh v. Townsquare Media, Judge Broderick held Townsquare’s use of Walsh’s photograph was fair use and granted judgment on the pleadings.

Who this affects

Rebecca Fay Walsh’s copyright-infringement claim was dismissed with prejudice, and Townsquare Media, Inc. obtained judgment based on the fair-use defense.

What happened

Walsh v. Townsquare Media, Inc. involved Rebecca Fay Walsh’s claim that Townsquare Media, Inc. infringed her copyright by publishing her photograph of Cardi B in an online XXL Mag article without a license. The photograph appeared as part of an embedded Instagram post by Cardi B; Townsquare later removed the post.

The court examined the four fair-use factors. It found that the photograph was used to show Cardi B’s social-media post, which was the subject of the article, rather than simply to depict Cardi B. The court also found that the photograph had already been published, that Townsquare used no more than necessary to show the post, and that the use was unlikely to compete with Walsh’s licensing market.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ruled that Townsquare’s use was fair as a matter of law, granted Townsquare’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and dismissed the action with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Walsh v. Townsquare Media, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-04958
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
June 1, 2020

Background

Rebecca Fay Walsh alleged that Townsquare Media, Inc. infringed her registered copyright in a photograph she took of Cardi B at a Tom Ford fashion show. Walsh made photographs of Cardi B available for licensing through Getty Images. Townsquare operated XXL Mag, an online website that published an article about Cardi B’s Tom Ford lipstick collaboration, social-media discussions, and a related rumored fight.

The article embedded three Instagram posts. One post by Cardi B contained a composite image showing a Tom Ford lipstick, Walsh’s photograph, and a headline stating that Cardi B’s Tom Ford lipstick had sold out. The article did not discuss Walsh’s photograph itself. After Walsh filed the lawsuit, Townsquare removed the post from the article.

Walsh asserted copyright infringement based on Townsquare’s unlicensed publication of the photograph. Townsquare moved for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). That motion asks the court to rule based on the pleadings and incorporated materials when no material factual issue remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fair-Use Analysis

The Copyright Act gives copyright owners exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and prepare derivative works, but it also recognizes fair use. Fair use is an affirmative defense, meaning the accused party bears the burden of establishing it. The court analyzed the four statutory factors.

Purpose and character of the use. The court found this factor strongly favored fair use. Walsh’s photograph was created to depict Cardi B at the fashion show. Townsquare did not use it as a generic image of Cardi B or as an image accompanying an article about the fashion show. Instead, Townsquare embedded the entire Instagram post because Cardi B’s creation and dissemination of that post were themselves the subject of the article. The court considered that use transformative because the photograph served a different function in the article: it appeared as part of the reported social-media post, along with the post’s other image, headline, caption, and Instagram features. The court also concluded that Townsquare’s commercial status did not outweigh the transformative nature of the use.

Nature of the copyrighted work. The photograph had both factual and creative elements. It documented a celebrity but also reflected technical skill and aesthetic judgment. The court considered this factor relatively neutral because of those mixed qualities, but found that the photograph’s prior publication on Instagram caused the factor to weigh slightly in Townsquare’s favor.

Amount used. Townsquare displayed an uncropped but resized version of the photograph as part of the Instagram post. The court found that the complete post was the only image that could accomplish the article’s purpose of showing the relevant social-media story. Because the photograph was already part of Cardi B’s post, Townsquare used no more of it than necessary for that purpose. This factor therefore favored fair use.

Effect on the market. The court found that Townsquare’s use was unlikely to compete with Walsh’s business or affect the value of her photograph. The photograph did not appear alone; it appeared within a post containing text and another image. The court concluded that someone seeking to license or purchase a Cardi B photograph was unlikely to choose the Instagram post instead of Walsh’s original photograph. This factor also favored fair use.

Ruling

Considering the factors together, the court held that Townsquare’s use of the photograph was fair as a matter of law. The court did not decide the unresolved legal question of whether embedding an image hosted elsewhere always constitutes a display under the Copyright Act because Townsquare did not raise that issue.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick granted Townsquare’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The court dismissed the action with prejudice, directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close the case, and terminated the motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 20-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.