Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 10, 2020

Figueroa v. Keyser

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:20-cv-03013
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
27
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Figueroa v. Keyser, Judge Koeltl set deadlines for responses to two filings and warned against extra submissions.

Who this affects

William Figueroa, the Government, and the court will follow the response and reply schedule; the order also directs chambers to mail Figueroa a copy.

What happened

Figueroa v. Keyser concerns filings by William Figueroa, who challenged his custody and conditions at Sullivan Correctional Facility, including alleged risks from COVID-19. The attached filings also sought permission to add information and requested release.

The court directed the Government to respond by June 24, 2020, and allowed Figueroa to reply by July 3, 2020. The order did not decide whether Figueroa should be released, whether his claims were legally valid, or whether the case should be dismissed or transferred.

Judge John G. Koeltl warned Figueroa that filing additional papers outside the schedule would delay resolution of the many filings already submitted. The court also directed its chambers to mail him a copy of the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Figueroa v. Keyser · No. 1:20-cv-03013
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
June 10, 2020

Nature of the Order

This is a scheduling and case-management order. The opinion states that the court received two additional filings from the petitioner and sets deadlines for the opposing side's response and the petitioner's reply. It does not rule on the merits of the petition or on any motion to dismiss, transfer, supplement, or obtain release.

Filings and Issues Raised

The attached filings state that William Figueroa was seeking relief related to his custody and alleged conditions at Sullivan Correctional Facility during the COVID-19 pandemic. They refer to a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, a federal procedure for challenging custody under a state-court judgment, and raise arguments about exhaustion of state remedies, venue, and alleged constitutional violations. The filings also seek permission to add factual material and request release. These statements are part of the submitted filings; the order does not decide whether they are established or legally sufficient.

Court’s Action

The court ordered the Government to respond by June 24, 2020. Figueroa may file a reply by July 3, 2020. Judge John G. Koeltl cautioned that additional filings outside the schedule would delay disposition of the numerous filings already submitted. The order further directed chambers to mail a copy to Figueroa. No other relief or final disposition is stated.

The authoritative version

Read the full 27-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.