Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2020

Wilder v. City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-03887
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Wilder v. City of New York, Judge Aaron ordered U.S. Marshals service for pro se plaintiff Wilder after permission to proceed without fees had been granted.

Who this affects

Alfred Wilder, the defendants, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service; the order also provided information for people representing themselves in civil cases.

What happened

In Wilder v. City of New York, Alfred Wilder had permission to proceed without paying court fees and therefore could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

The order directed the Clerk of Court to prepare service forms and summonses for each defendant and provide the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. Wilder was told to notify the court in writing if his address changed, and that the case could be dismissed if he failed to do so.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron also provided filing and legal-clinic information for people representing themselves and ordered that a copy of the order be mailed to Wilder.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wilder v. City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-03887
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 16, 2020

Background

Alfred Wilder had been granted permission to proceed without paying court fees. Under the governing service rules, a person proceeding this way may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Order

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue summonses, and deliver the paperwork needed for the Marshals Service to complete service. The order also required Wilder to notify the court in writing of any address change and stated that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Because Wilder was representing himself, the court encouraged electronic filing during the health crisis and gave information about a legal clinic operated by the New York Legal Assistance Group. The order clarified that the clinic is a private organization and is not part of the court. A copy of the order was to be mailed to Wilder.

Disposition

Judge Stewart D. Aaron entered an order of service. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims against the City of New York or the other defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.