Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2020

Dickerson v. City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-03893
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Dickerson v. City of New York, Judge Aaron ordered the Marshals Service to serve defendants for the permission-approved unrepresented plaintiff.

Who this affects

Issac Dickerson, who was proceeding without a lawyer and had permission to proceed without paying the filing fee, and the City of New York and the other defendants who were to be served by the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

Issac Dickerson sued the City of New York and other defendants. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. Because Dickerson was allowed to proceed without paying the filing fee, he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to prepare service forms, issue summonses, and give the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. Dickerson was told to notify the court if his address changes, and that the case could be dismissed if he fails to do so. The order also provided information about filing by email and a legal clinic for people without lawyers.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued the order of service on June 16, 2020. The order addressed service and related filing information; it did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dickerson v. City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-03893
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 16, 2020

Background

Issac Dickerson brought this action against the City of New York and other defendants. The order does not identify or resolve the underlying claims. It states that Dickerson had been granted permission to proceed without paying the filing fee.

Service of Process

Because Dickerson was proceeding without paying the filing fee, the court explained that he was entitled to rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The Clerk of Court was instructed to complete a separate U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue summonses, and deliver the paperwork needed for service to the Marshals Service.

Additional Instructions

Dickerson was required to notify the court in writing if his address changed. The order stated that the court may dismiss the action if he failed to provide that notice. It also encouraged people proceeding without lawyers to submit filings by email during the health crisis and provided information about a legal clinic operated by the New York Legal Assistance Group. The order clarified that the clinic was a private organization and was not part of the court.

Disposition

Judge Stewart D. Aaron entered an order of service. The order did not rule on the merits of Dickerson’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.