Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 18, 2020

Ashley v. City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-03888
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Anthony Ashley v. City of New York, Judge Aaron ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve six defendants because Ashley was allowed to proceed without paying fees.

Who this affects

Anthony Ashley, the six listed defendants, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

Anthony Ashley v. City of New York is an order about serving the defendants, not about whether Ashley’s claims were valid. The court noted that Ashley had permission to proceed without paying filing fees and therefore could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to make service.

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to prepare service forms and summonses for the City of New York, Project Renewal, the New York City Housing Authority, Mayor Bill de Blasio, the New York State Office of Alcoholism Substance Abuse Services, and Sera Security. Ashley was also told to notify the court if his address changes and was given information about filing by email and a legal clinic for people without lawyers.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued the amended order of service on June 18, 2020. The order directed the Marshals Service to serve the listed defendants and did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ashley v. City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-03888
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 18, 2020

Background

Anthony Ashley had been granted permission to proceed without paying filing fees. The order explains that a person granted that permission may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The order cites the federal statute and rule requiring the court to direct the Marshals Service to serve process in such cases.

Court’s action

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each of these defendants at the listed addresses: City of New York; Project Renewal; New York City Housing Authority; Mayor Bill de Blasio; New York State Office of Alcoholism Substance Abuse Services; and Sera Security. The Clerk was also instructed to issue summonses and provide the Marshals Service with the paperwork needed to serve them.

Additional instructions

Ashley was required to notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the order states that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so. The order also advised people proceeding without lawyers that they were encouraged, during the health crisis, to submit filings by email. It provided information about a legal clinic operated by the New York Legal Assistance Group and stated that the clinic was not part of the court and could not file documents for parties.

Disposition

Judge Stewart D. Aaron entered an amended order of service. The order directed service through the U.S. Marshals Service and did not rule on the merits of Ashley’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.