Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 22, 2020

Sun v. New York City Police Department

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:18-cv-11002
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sun v. New York City Police Department, Judge Swain denied transfer and appeal fee-free status and said other requests were improperly directed.

Who this affects

Yi Sun’s requests for outside investigations, transfer of her pending cases, and fee-free status for an appeal were affected. The defendants’ underlying case rights were not decided by this order.

What happened

In Sun v. New York City Police Department, Yi Sun asked the court to remove and consolidate her pending cases in courts in Washington, D.C. She also asked for review or investigation by the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or the Senate Judiciary Committee, and asked the Department of Justice to begin a criminal case.

The court said those requests were improperly directed to it and that it could not grant them. It treated the request to move the pending cases as a request to transfer venue and denied it again because earlier orders had found no proper legal or factual basis.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal. The order resolved docket entry number 80.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sun v. New York City Police Department · No. 1:18-cv-11002
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 22, 2020

Background

The court reviewed Yi Sun’s “Verified Petition,” “Notice of Removal to Consolidate and Review,” and letter asking the court to grant her request to “Remove and Consolidate.” The filings were docket entries 104 through 106.

Sun asked for review of the facts underlying her case by the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or the Senate Judiciary Committee, or for a special investigation by those entities. She also asked the Department of Justice to initiate a criminal action. The court stated that these requests were improperly directed to it and that it could not grant them. The court noted that Sun could direct applications or communications to those other government entities.

Transfer Request

The court interpreted Sun’s request to remove her pending cases in the district to “the Courts in Washington D.C.” as a request to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). It stated that it had previously denied the same request for lack of a proper legal or factual basis in orders dated August 14, August 23, and September 4, 2019. The court denied the request again.

Appeal and Disposition

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order resolved docket entry number 80. It did not decide the underlying merits of Sun’s case.

Classification Basis

This is a procedural order because it addressed requests for investigation, transfer of venue, and fee-free appeal status without deciding the underlying legal claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.