Sun v. New York City Police Department
- Laura Swain
- 1:18-cv-11002
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Sun v. New York City Police Department, Judge Swain denied transfer and appeal fee-free status and said other requests were improperly directed.
Yi Sun’s requests for outside investigations, transfer of her pending cases, and fee-free status for an appeal were affected. The defendants’ underlying case rights were not decided by this order.
What happened
In Sun v. New York City Police Department, Yi Sun asked the court to remove and consolidate her pending cases in courts in Washington, D.C. She also asked for review or investigation by the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or the Senate Judiciary Committee, and asked the Department of Justice to begin a criminal case.
The court said those requests were improperly directed to it and that it could not grant them. It treated the request to move the pending cases as a request to transfer venue and denied it again because earlier orders had found no proper legal or factual basis.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal. The order resolved docket entry number 80.
The detailed version
- Sun v. New York City Police Department · No. 1:18-cv-11002
- Laura Swain
- June 22, 2020
Background
The court reviewed Yi Sun’s “Verified Petition,” “Notice of Removal to Consolidate and Review,” and letter asking the court to grant her request to “Remove and Consolidate.” The filings were docket entries 104 through 106.
Sun asked for review of the facts underlying her case by the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or the Senate Judiciary Committee, or for a special investigation by those entities. She also asked the Department of Justice to initiate a criminal action. The court stated that these requests were improperly directed to it and that it could not grant them. The court noted that Sun could direct applications or communications to those other government entities.
Transfer Request
The court interpreted Sun’s request to remove her pending cases in the district to “the Courts in Washington D.C.” as a request to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). It stated that it had previously denied the same request for lack of a proper legal or factual basis in orders dated August 14, August 23, and September 4, 2019. The court denied the request again.
Appeal and Disposition
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order resolved docket entry number 80. It did not decide the underlying merits of Sun’s case.
Classification Basis
This is a procedural order because it addressed requests for investigation, transfer of venue, and fee-free appeal status without deciding the underlying legal claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.