Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 2, 2020

Hickman v. The City of New York

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:20-cv-04603
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hickman v. City of New York, Judge McMahon ordered Hickman to pay filing fees or submit a fee-waiver application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Quandel Hickman, a detained self-represented prisoner, must either pay the required filing fees or submit the required fee-waiver materials within 30 days to continue the action.

What happened

Hickman v. The City of New York concerns a civil action filed by Quandel Hickman, who was detained and represented himself. He submitted a complaint and a prisoner authorization but did not submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court ordered Hickman, within 30 days, either to pay $400 in filing and administrative fees or submit the required application. If he applies to proceed without prepaying fees, the court may collect the $350 filing fee in installments from his prison trust account. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order, and no summons would issue at that time.

Judge Colleen McMahon warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the action, but the order did not decide the claims’ merits. The court also found that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hickman v. The City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-04603
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
July 2, 2020

Background

Quandel Hickman filed a civil action against The City of New York and other defendants while detained at the Anna M. Kross Correctional Center. The order states that Hickman was proceeding without a lawyer. He submitted a complaint and a prisoner authorization, but he did not submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Order

The court ordered Hickman, within 30 days of July 2, 2020, to do one of two things: pay $400 in filing fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee, or submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees. A prisoner seeking that status must also authorize deductions from the prison trust account and provide certified account statements for the previous six months. If the court grants the application, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments; the $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted this status.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Hickman a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures if Hickman complied, and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed period.

Other Ruling and Effect

Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order did not address the underlying claims. It also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim could count as a statutory “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), affecting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees after three such strikes.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.