Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 1, 2021

Ngono v. Owono

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:21-cv-00095
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Ngono v. Owono, Judge Gardephe ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Who this affects

Andre Marie Ngono must complete and return service forms within 30 days or request summonses directly; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service must then carry out the service process for Luc Owono, Kamara Youssouf, and Africa Employment Agency.

What happened

In Ngono v. Owono, Andre Marie Ngono, representing himself, alleges that the defendants subjected him to forced labor and human trafficking under federal laws. The court had allowed him to proceed without paying fees in advance.

The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after summonses are issued and directed the Clerk of Court to send Ngono a service form for each defendant. Ngono must return the completed forms within 30 days, after which the court will issue summonses and provide the paperwork to the U.S. Marshals Service.

Judge Paul G. Gardephe warned that the case may be dismissed if Ngono does not return the forms or request summonses within 30 days. The order did not decide whether his claims are valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ngono v. Owono · No. 1:21-cv-00095
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
Mar. 1, 2021

Background

Andre Marie Ngono, appearing without a lawyer, brought claims under the Alien Tort Statute, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, and the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act. He alleges that Luc Owono, Kamara Youssouf, and Africa Employment Agency subjected him to forced labor and human trafficking. The court had previously granted Ngono permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of process

Because Ngono was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court extended the normal deadline for service to 90 days after the summonses are issued, recognizing that Ngono could not have served the defendants before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses to be issued.

The Clerk of Court was directed to send Ngono one U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, known as a USM-285 form, for each defendant. Ngono must complete and return the forms within 30 days of the order. After receiving them, the Clerk must issue the summonses and provide the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. Ngono may instead notify the court in writing within 30 days that he does not want to use the Marshals Service and request that the summonses be issued directly to him.

Ruling and effect

Judge Paul G. Gardephe entered an order directing the Clerk to mail Ngono a copy of the order and an information package, and to send him the three USM-285 forms. The court stated that it may dismiss the action for failure to prosecute if Ngono does not return the forms or request summonses within 30 days. The court also required Ngono to notify it in writing if his address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so. The order addressed service and case administration; it did not decide the merits of the forced-labor or human-trafficking allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.