Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 23, 2020

Gardner v. New York City

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-02333
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Gardner v. New York City, Judge McMahon transferred Gardner’s civil-rights action to the Eastern District of New York because the accident occurred in Brooklyn.

Who this affects

Franklin Gardner’s case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The defendants named in the action were New York City, the vehicle’s driver, and other New York City Department of Correction officers.

What happened

In Gardner v. New York City, Franklin Gardner, who was incarcerated and representing himself, alleged that he was injured in a vehicle accident while being transported from Rikers Island to court in Kings County. He sued New York City, the vehicle’s driver, and city correction officers under a federal civil-rights law.

The court said venue was proper in both the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. It chose the Eastern District because the accident occurred in Brooklyn and related records would likely be there.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York under the federal transfer law. The Southern District case was closed, and that court did not decide whether Gardner could proceed without paying filing fees; the transferee court would decide that issue.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gardner v. New York City · No. 1:20-cv-02333
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
July 23, 2020

Background

Franklin Gardner, who was incarcerated at Elmira Correctional Facility and represented himself, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that he was injured in a motor-vehicle accident while being transported from Rikers Island to New York Supreme Court, Kings County. The defendants included the City of New York, the vehicle’s driver, and other New York City Department of Correction officers.

Venue and Transfer Analysis

The court explained that venue was proper in the Southern District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) because the City of New York was located there. But 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) allows a court to transfer a case for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The court also stated that it could order a transfer on its own initiative.

The court concluded that venue was also proper in the Eastern District because the City of New York was located there as well and because the underlying events occurred in Brooklyn, in Kings County. It further reasoned that records connected to the accident would be located in Brooklyn. Considering the relevant circumstances, the court found that transferring the action to the Eastern District was in the interest of justice.

Disposition

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and to mail Gardner a copy of the order. The court stated that the transferee court would decide whether Gardner could proceed without prepaying fees. No summons would issue from the Southern District, and the order closed that case. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.