Shomoye v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- Analisa Torres
- 1:20-cv-05225
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Shomoye v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Judge Torres ordered the Marshals Service to serve USCIS after Shomoye could proceed without paying fees.
AdeBambo Shomoye and USCIS; the order sets up service of the lawsuit and does not decide the underlying naturalization dispute.
What happened
In Shomoye v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Adebambo Shomoye alleged that the agency had not rescheduled his naturalization oath ceremony, the final step in the naturalization process.
Because the court allowed Shomoye to proceed without paying filing fees, it ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the agency. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and directed the Clerk of Court to prepare the required documents.
Judge Torres ordered the Clerk to issue the summons and deliver the necessary papers to the Marshals Service. The order addressed service of the lawsuit, not whether Shomoye was entitled to a rescheduled ceremony.
The detailed version
- Shomoye v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · No. 1:20-cv-05225
- Analisa Torres
- July 27, 2020
Background
AdeBambo Shomoye, proceeding without a lawyer, sued U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). He alleged that USCIS had failed to reschedule his naturalization oath ceremony, which the court described as the final step in the naturalization process. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees.
Service of Process
Because Shomoye was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve USCIS. The court extended the general deadline for service, providing that service would be timely if completed within 90 days after the summons was issued. The court stated that, if service was not completed within that period, Shomoye should request an extension.
The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete the U.S. Marshals Service forms with USCIS’s address, mark the forms for service on the United States, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with this order and the other documents needed for service. Shomoye was also required to notify the court in writing of any address change, and the court stated that it could dismiss the action if he failed to do so.
Disposition
Judge Analisa Torres entered an order directing the Clerk of Court to arrange service of the lawsuit on USCIS through the U.S. Marshals Service. The opinion does not decide whether USCIS was required to reschedule Shomoye’s naturalization oath ceremony.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.