Julius v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Robert Lehrburger
- 1:20-cv-01879
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Julius v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Lehrburger ordered service steps for Elizabeth Julius and warned that missed deadlines could lead to dismissal.
Elizabeth Julius, who must complete service or request a summons and meet the stated deadlines; the Commissioner of Social Security, who is to be served as the defendant.
What happened
Julius v. Commissioner of Social Security concerns Elizabeth Julius’s responsibility to serve the Commissioner of Social Security after filing the case without paying filing fees.
The court directed the Clerk to send Julius a U.S. Marshals Service process form. Within 30 days, she had to return the completed form or notify the court that she wanted a summons issued directly to her. After a summons was issued, she had 120 days to complete service or request more time.
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger issued the order of service on July 28, 2020. The order did not decide the underlying Social Security dispute, but warned that the court may dismiss the case for failure to prosecute if Julius missed the required deadlines or failed to report an address change.
The detailed version
- Julius v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:20-cv-01879
- Robert Lehrburger
- July 28, 2020
Background
Elizabeth Julius was proceeding without paying filing fees. The court issued an order explaining how she could serve the Commissioner of Social Security through the U.S. Marshals Service or request a summons to serve the defendant herself.
Service Instructions
The Clerk of Court was directed to send Julius one U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, known as a USM-285 form. Within 30 days after the order, Julius had to complete and return the form for the defendant. Alternatively, she could notify the court in writing within that 30-day period that she did not want to use the Marshals Service and request that a summons be issued directly to her.
After receiving the completed form, the Clerk was directed to issue a summons and provide the Marshals Service with the paperwork needed to serve the Commissioner. Regardless of which service method Julius chose, she had to complete service within 120 days after the summons was issued. The order stated that Julius was responsible for checking with the Marshals Service about whether service had occurred and, if necessary, requesting an extension of time.
Warnings and Disposition
The court warned that it may dismiss the action for failure to prosecute if Julius did not return the USM-285 form or request a summons within 30 days, or if she did not complete service or request an extension within 120 days after the summons was issued. The court also stated that Julius had to promptly notify the court in writing if her address changed and that the action could be dismissed if she failed to do so.
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger entered an order of service. This order addressed case-administration and service requirements; it did not decide the merits of Julius’s Social Security claim.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.