Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 12, 2020

Wilson v. Figeroua

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:19-cv-04537
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Wilson v. Figueroa, Judge Briccetti ordered Hasson K. Wilson to provide his address or face dismissal for failing to prosecute.

Who this affects

Hasson K. Wilson was required to update his address and was warned that the case would be dismissed if he failed to comply. The defendants were not subject to a merits ruling in this order.

What happened

In Wilson v. Figueroa, Hasson K. Wilson, who was representing himself, had not told the court his current address after mail was returned as undeliverable because he had been released or paroled.

The court ordered Wilson to provide his current address in writing by September 11, 2020. It warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal for failing to prosecute or follow court orders. The court had not dismissed the case in this order.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti also denied Wilson permission to appeal without paying filing fees, certifying that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wilson v. Figeroua · No. 7:19-cv-04537
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Aug. 12, 2020

Background

Hasson K. Wilson filed the action while incarcerated and was proceeding without a lawyer and under a process allowing him to proceed without paying court fees. The opinion states that Wilson notified the court of address changes to several correctional facilities, but mail sent to his last known address was later returned as undeliverable with the notation, “No longer here. Paroled/released.”

The court’s July 9, 2020, order required Wilson to provide his current address in writing by August 10, 2020, and warned that the case could be dismissed if he failed to update his address. The July 9 order was also returned as undeliverable. As of this order, Wilson had not provided an updated address. Earlier court materials had likewise told him that he was responsible for notifying the court of address changes.

Order

The court ordered Wilson to update the court in writing about his current address by September 11, 2020. It stated that failure to comply with the order would result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court did not dismiss the action in this order.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The court directed its chambers to mail a copy of the order to Wilson at his last known address on the docket.

Effect

The order imposed a deadline and warned of dismissal; it did not decide the underlying claims against the correctional-officer defendants. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti signed the order on August 12, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.