Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Construction
Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, and Training Program Fund v. AMM Construction, Inc.
- Analisa Torres
- 1:20-cv-06445
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Mason Tenders v. AMM Construction, Judge Torres set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.
The order imposed filing, response, reply, service, and proof-of-service deadlines on the petitioners and AMM Construction, Inc.; it did not decide whether the arbitration award would be confirmed.
What happened
In Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, and Training Program Fund v. AMM Construction, Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award filed on August 13, 2020.
The court ordered the petitioners to file supporting materials by September 17, 2020, AMM Construction to respond by October 7, and the petitioners to reply by October 14, if they wished. The court also required service of the petition and order by August 31 and proof of service by September 7.
Judge Analisa Torres issued this scheduling and service order. The order did not decide whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.
The detailed version
- Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Construction · No. 1:20-cv-06445
- Analisa Torres
- Aug. 17, 2020
Background
The petitioners filed a petition on August 13, 2020, asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The petitioners were the Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, and Training Program Fund; Anna Gustin, acting as Director; and Robert Bonanza, acting as Business Manager of The Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York. AMM Construction, Inc. was the respondent.
Court’s Orders
The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment. It ordered the petitioners, by September 17, 2020, to file and serve a statement required by Local Civil Rule 56.1 and any additional supporting materials, including legal memoranda, the arbitration award, supporting documents, and affidavits or declarations confirming that exhibits were true and correct copies.
AMM Construction had until October 7, 2020, to file its opposition. The petitioners had until October 14, 2020, to file a reply, if any.
The court also ordered the petitioners to serve the petition and the order on AMM Construction by personal service, and by email if available, by August 31, 2020. Service was to be made on an officer, director, managing or general agent, cashier or assistant cashier, or another agent authorized to receive service under New York law. The petitioners also had to serve the Secretary of State under New York Business Corporation Law § 306 and file an affidavit proving service by September 7, 2020.
Disposition
Judge Analisa Torres issued an order setting briefing and service requirements. The opinion does not state that the court confirmed or refused to confirm the arbitration award, so it did not resolve that petition on the merits.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.