Sadowski v. Barstool Sports, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:20-cv-01948
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Sadowski v. Barstool Sports, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the settled case, allowing restoration by September 18, 2020, before dismissal becomes with prejudice.
Christopher Sadowski and Barstool Sports, Inc.; the case was discontinued after the parties reported a settlement, subject to restoration by September 18, 2020.
What happened
In Sadowski v. Barstool Sports, Inc., the parties told the court that they had settled the case.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed either party to ask to restore it to the court’s calendar by September 18, 2020.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Sadowski v. Barstool Sports, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-01948
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 19, 2020
Background The parties reported to the court that they had settled the case. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by September 18, 2020. The court further ordered that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored.
Effect The case was dismissed based on the reported settlement, subject to the stated restoration deadline. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.