Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 24, 2020

Hay v. New York Media LLC

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:20-cv-06135
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hay v. New York Media LLC, Judge McMahon ordered Bruce Hay to pay fees or apply to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Bruce Hay, who was required to pay the case fees or submit an application to proceed without prepayment within 30 days; the case would be dismissed if he did not comply.

What happened

In Hay v. New York Media LLC, Bruce Hay brought a civil action without a lawyer but did not pay the required fees or submit an application to proceed without prepayment.

The court gave Hay 30 days to pay $400 or submit a signed application showing that he could not afford to pay the fees. The court said no summons would issue at that time and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Colleen McMahon also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hay v. New York Media LLC · No. 1:20-cv-06135
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Aug. 24, 2020

Background

Bruce Hay filed this civil action without a lawyer against New York Media, LLC and other defendants. He submitted a complaint but did not pay the required $400 in filing and administrative fees and did not submit an application to proceed without prepayment of fees, commonly called an IFP application.

Order

The court ordered Hay, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 in fees or submit a signed IFP application labeled with the case's docket number. The order explained that, if the court granted the application, Hay could proceed without paying the fees in advance. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Hay and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time.

The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk's procedures if Hay complied. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. This order did not address the merits of Hay's claims.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. Judge Colleen McMahon entered the order.

Practical effect

The case could move forward only if Hay paid the required fees or submitted an IFP application within 30 days. The opinion states that failure to do so would result in dismissal, but it does not state that the action was dismissed in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.