Williams v. FRM Socks, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:20-cv-03792
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Judge Vyskocil dismissed Williams v. FRM Socks for failure to prosecute, allowing restoration by September 24, 2020; otherwise dismissal would be with prejudice.
The order affected Pamela Williams’s action against FRM Socks, LLC. The case was discontinued for failure to prosecute, with a stated opportunity to seek restoration by September 24, 2020; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
What happened
In Williams v. FRM Socks, LLC, Pamela Williams sued FRM Socks, LLC, individually and for others similarly situated.
The complaint was filed on May 15, 2020, and the defendant’s response was due July 15, 2020, after an extension. No response was filed, and Williams did not continue pursuing the case.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil discontinued the action for failure to prosecute without costs and without prejudice to restoring it by September 24, 2020. If no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Williams v. FRM Socks, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-03792
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 24, 2020
Background
Pamela Williams filed a complaint against FRM Socks, LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The complaint was filed on May 15, 2020. An executed summons was filed on June 12, 2020. After an extension sought by Williams, the response to the complaint was due July 15, 2020.
Court’s Ruling
The court stated that no response had been filed and that Williams had not prosecuted the case. It ordered that the action be discontinued for failure to prosecute, without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore was made by September 24, 2020. The order further stated that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.