Urena v. United States
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:18-cv-09995-PAE
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Urena v. United States, Judge Engelmayer reappointed trial counsel to submit a limited memorandum supporting Urena’s petition based on United States v. Davis.
Carlos Urena, his reappointed trial counsel Gregory Cooper, and the United States.
What happened
Urena v. United States concerns Carlos Urena’s petition under Section 2255, based on United States v. Davis.
The court reappointed Urena’s trial counsel, Gregory Cooper, for the limited purpose of submitting a supporting letter memorandum. The memorandum was due September 11, 2020, and the government’s response was due September 25, 2020.
Judge Paul A. Engelmayer entered this order. The order addressed counsel and briefing only; it did not decide Urena’s petition.
The detailed version
- Urena v. United States · No. 1:18-cv-09995-PAE
- Paul Engelmayer
- Aug. 25, 2020
Background
Carlos Urena filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). The opinion does not decide the petition’s merits.
Order
The court reappointed Urena’s trial counsel, Gregory Cooper, for the limited purpose of submitting a letter memorandum supporting the petition. The memorandum was due Friday, September 11, 2020. The government’s response was due Friday, September 25, 2020.
Disposition
Judge Paul A. Engelmayer ordered the limited reappointment and set the briefing deadlines. The order did not rule on the Section 2255 petition.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.