Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 10, 2020

Uddin v. National Recovery Agency

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:19-cv-05625
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Uddin v. NRA Group, LLC, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by October 12, 2020.

Who this affects

Plaintiff Reyad Uddin and NRA Group, LLC, the only remaining defendant, were affected by the discontinuance and its deadline for possible restoration.

What happened

In Uddin v. NRA Group, LLC, Plaintiff Reyad Uddin and the only remaining defendant, NRA Group, LLC, told the court they had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar by October 12, 2020.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Uddin v. National Recovery Agency · No. 1:19-cv-05625
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Sept. 10, 2020

Background

Plaintiff Reyad Uddin and NRA Group, LLC—the only remaining defendant—reported to the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if a restoration request was made by October 12, 2020. The order states that if no such request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.