Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 21, 2020

Perez Lopez v. Lucero Produce II Corp.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:19-cv-11619
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Perez Lopez v. Lucero Produce II Corp., Judge Carter approved the settlement and discontinued the matter with prejudice, without costs or fees.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants, whose settlement was approved and whose matter was discontinued with prejudice without costs or fees as to any party.

What happened

In Perez Lopez v. Lucero Produce II Corp., the parties filed a settlement agreement with the court.

The court reviewed the agreement as required by the cited precedent and evaluated whether it was fair and reasonable.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. approved the settlement and discontinued the matter with prejudice, without costs or fees as to any party.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez Lopez v. Lucero Produce II Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-11619
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Sept. 21, 2020

Background

The court received a settlement agreement filed by the parties on August 14, 2020.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the settlement agreement as required by Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). It found that the settlement was fair and reasonable.

Ruling

The court approved the settlement. It discontinued the matter with prejudice and without costs or fees as to any party.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.