Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 24, 2020

Azzarmi v. Catania

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:20-cv-04712
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Azzarmi v. Catania, Judge Karas extended the service deadline and ordered Marshals service for added defendant Kristina Kiefer.

Who this affects

Aasir Azzarmi and Kristina Kiefer were directly affected. The Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to complete and carry out service, and fee-free status was denied for any appeal from the order.

What happened

Aasir Azzarmi, representing himself, sued Chris Catania and later added Kristina Kiefer in a defamation case based on diversity of citizenship.

Because Azzarmi was allowed to proceed without paying court fees upfront, the court explained that the court and U.S. Marshals Service would handle service. It extended the service deadline until 90 days after summonses were issued for the amended complaint.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas directed the Clerk to prepare the service paperwork and send it to the Marshals Service for service on Kiefer. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Azzarmi v. Catania · No. 7:20-cv-04712
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Sept. 24, 2020

Background

Aasir Azzarmi, proceeding without a lawyer, brought a defamation lawsuit under the diversity-of-citizenship statute. He originally named Chris Catania as a defendant. The court had already allowed Azzarmi to proceed without prepaying filing fees, meaning he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve process. Catania was served on September 14, 2020.

On that same date, Azzarmi filed an amended complaint adding Kristina Kiefer as a defendant. The order addresses service of the amended complaint on Kiefer; it does not decide whether Azzarmi's defamation allegations are legally or factually valid.

Service ruling

The court extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses were issued. It explained that Azzarmi could not serve the summonses and amended complaint before the court reviewed the amended complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The court stated that Azzarmi should request an extension if service was not completed within that period.

The Clerk of Court was directed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Kiefer, issue the summonses, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The order also required Azzarmi to notify the court in writing if his address changed and stated that the action could be dismissed if he failed to do so.

Disposition

Judge Kenneth M. Karas ordered the Clerk to mail Azzarmi a copy of the order and an information package, and to provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Kiefer. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal from this order. The order does not rule on the merits of the defamation suit.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.