Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 25, 2020

Bacon v. Evans

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:20-cv-06337
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Bacon v. Evans, Judge Karas ordered Marshals Service of Bacon’s lawsuit and extended the service deadline until 90 days after summons issuance.

Who this affects

Ryan-Mykal S. Bacon and Joshua Evans; the order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to arrange service of Bacon’s lawsuit on Evans.

What happened

Ryan-Mykal S. Bacon sued Joshua Evans under a federal civil-rights law, alleging violations of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Bacon is incarcerated and is representing himself. The court had allowed him to proceed without paying court fees upfront.

Because Bacon was allowed to proceed without paying fees upfront, the court said the U.S. Marshals Service must serve Evans. The court extended the service deadline until 90 days after the summons is issued and said Bacon should request more time if service is not completed by then.

In Bacon v. Evans, Judge Kenneth M. Karas directed the Clerk of Court to prepare the service paperwork, issue a summons, and give the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide whether Bacon’s constitutional claims have merit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bacon v. Evans · No. 7:20-cv-06337
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Sept. 25, 2020

Background

Ryan-Mykal S. Bacon, who was incarcerated at Sullivan Correctional Facility, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims for certain constitutional violations by state actors. He alleged that Joshua Evans violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Bacon was representing himself. The court had previously granted his request to proceed without paying court fees upfront, although the opinion notes that prisoners must still pay the full filing fee over time under the applicable statute.

Service of the Lawsuit

Because Bacon was allowed to proceed without paying fees upfront, the court determined that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Evans. The court explained that Bacon could not serve the summons and complaint before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued. It therefore extended the time for service until 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Bacon should request an extension of time.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to prepare a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Evans, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve him at the address listed in the order. The court also required Bacon to notify the court in writing if his address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Ruling

Judge Kenneth M. Karas ordered the Clerk of Court to mail Bacon a copy of the order and an information package, complete the service forms, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order addressed service of process only; it did not decide the merits of Bacon’s constitutional claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.