Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 9, 2020

Asuncion v. Bard College

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:20-cv-04061
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
EmploymentCivil RightsCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Asuncion v. Bard College, Judge Román ordered Marshals to serve the pro se plaintiff’s discrimination lawsuit after permission to proceed without fees.

Who this affects

John A. Asuncion and Bard College were affected. The order directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to arrange service on Bard College.

What happened

In Asuncion v. Bard College, John A. Asuncion, representing himself, alleged that Bard College discriminated against him because of his sex and race under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

Because the court had allowed Asuncion to proceed without prepaying filing fees, the court explained that the U.S. Marshals Service would handle service. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Nelson Stephen Román instructed the Clerk of Court to prepare the service form, issue the summons, and give the necessary papers to the Marshals Service for service on Bard College. The court also required Asuncion to report any address change and warned that the action could be dismissed if he did not.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Asuncion v. Bard College · No. 7:20-cv-04061
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Oct. 9, 2020

Background

John A. Asuncion, appearing without a lawyer, brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. He alleged that Bard College discriminated against him because of his sex and race. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without prepaying filing fees, a status commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis.

Service of Process

Because Asuncion was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint. Under the usual rule, service generally must occur within 90 days after the complaint is filed. The court determined that this deadline should instead run for 90 days after the summons is issued, because Asuncion could not have served the papers before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered issuance of a summons.

The court stated that Asuncion should request more time if service was not completed within that period. It also required him to notify the court in writing if his address changed and stated that the action could be dismissed if he failed to do so.

Order

Judge Nelson Stephen Román instructed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with Bard College’s address, issue a summons, and deliver the documents needed for service to the Marshals Service. The order arranged service of the lawsuit; it did not decide whether Asuncion’s discrimination claims were legally valid. Asuncion had consented to receive court documents electronically.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.