Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 30, 2020

Ruggiero v. Orange County Jail

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:19-cv-03632
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ruggiero v. Orange County Jail, Judge Briccetti dismissed the case with prejudice after Ruggiero twice failed to attend scheduled conferences.

Who this affects

The order ended Francis Henry Ruggiero’s case against Sergeant K. Lyons, Dr. Salwa Khouri, and Health Service Administrator Ibellis Diaz by dismissing it with prejudice.

What happened

In Ruggiero v. Orange County Jail, Francis Henry Ruggiero did not attend two scheduled telephone conferences, and he gave the court no excuse or explanation. The court had previously warned him that another failure to appear could lead to dismissal.

The court dismissed the case with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). It also denied permission to appeal without paying court fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and ordered the case closed.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti issued the order on October 30, 2020, after considering the factors identified in the court’s cited precedent.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ruggiero v. Orange County Jail · No. 7:19-cv-03632
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Oct. 30, 2020

Background

The opinion’s caption identifies Francis Henry Ruggiero as the plaintiff and Sergeant K. Lyons, Dr. Salwa Khouri, and Health Service Administrator Ibellis Diaz as defendants. On August 28, 2020, the court scheduled an initial case-management and scheduling conference for October 14, 2020, to be held by telephone. Defense counsel attended, but Ruggiero did not appear and provided no excuse or explanation.

On October 14, the court deemed Ruggiero to have abandoned the case and adjourned the conference to October 30, 2020. The court warned him, in bold and underlined language, that another failure to appear could result in dismissal for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court mailed the order to the address on the docket, and the mailing was not returned as undeliverable.

Ruling

Defense counsel appeared at the October 30 telephone conference, but Ruggiero again failed to appear and gave no excuse or explanation. After considering the factors identified in Lucas v. Miles, the court dismissed the case with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders under Rule 41(b). “With prejudice” means the dismissal bars refiling the same case.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to pursue an appeal without paying court fees. The clerk was instructed to close the case, and chambers was directed to mail the order to Ruggiero.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.