Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 5, 2020

Greathouse v. Vasquez

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:20-cv-08748
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Section 1983Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Greathouse v. Vasquez, Judge Engelmayer ordered U.S. Marshals to serve defendants and extended the service deadline in this pro se civil-rights case.

Who this affects

Leon Greathouse, Freddie Vasquez, Cyrus Vance, and the City of New York; the order also directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to take specified service-related actions.

What happened

Greathouse v. Vasquez is a pro se lawsuit under a federal civil-rights law brought by Leon Greathouse, who is incarcerated, against Freddie Vasquez, Cyrus Vance, and the City of New York. The opinion does not describe the specific constitutional-rights allegations.

Because the court had allowed Greathouse to proceed without paying court fees in advance, he could use the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons was issued and directed the Clerk of Court to prepare the required forms and paperwork.

Judge Engelmayer ordered the Clerk to send the documents to the Marshals Service for service on the defendants and to mail Greathouse a copy of the order and an information package. The order also required Greathouse to notify the court if his address changes and warned that the action could be dismissed if he does not do so.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Greathouse v. Vasquez · No. 1:20-cv-08748
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Nov. 5, 2020

Background

Leon Greathouse, who was incarcerated at Mohawk Correctional Facility, filed this lawsuit without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims that state actors violated constitutional rights. The defendants were Freddie Vasquez, New York County District Attorney Cyrus Vance, and the City of New York. The opinion does not state the specific constitutional violations alleged.

The court had previously allowed Greathouse to proceed without paying the filing fee in advance. The order notes that prisoners still must pay the full filing fee over time even when granted that permission.

Service of Process

Because Greathouse was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, he was entitled to rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint. The court explained that the usual 90-day service period could not begin in the ordinary way because Greathouse could not serve the defendants until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered a summons issued. The court therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summons was issued.

The Clerk of Court was instructed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summons, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The order listed service addresses for Freddie Vasquez, Cyrus Vance, and the City of New York.

Ruling and Effect

The court entered an order of service. It did not decide whether Greathouse's constitutional-rights claims were valid. The Clerk was directed to send the order and an information package to Greathouse. Greathouse was also required to notify the court in writing of any address change, and the court stated that the action could be dismissed if he failed to do so.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer signed the order on November 5, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.