Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 6, 2020

Girotto v. Margaux New York, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:20-cv-02158
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Girotto v. Margaux New York, LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled action without costs, subject to possible timely restoration.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendants in the action; the case was discontinued following the parties’ reported settlement.

What happened

In Girotto v. Margaux New York, LLC, the parties told the court they had reached a settlement.

The court discontinued the action without costs and allowed either party to seek restoration to the court’s calendar by December 6, 2020.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Girotto v. Margaux New York, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-02158
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Nov. 6, 2020

Background

On November 5, 2020, the parties filed a letter informing the court that they had reached a settlement.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application to restore the action was made by December 6, 2020. The court further ordered that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Effect

The action was discontinued based on the reported settlement. The order did not describe the settlement’s terms or resolve the underlying claims on their merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.